Pasteurized vs. Unpasteurized Milk: The Debate Continues
Posted by Emilee | Posted in Be Healthy, Food Safety, Foodborne Illness, In the News, Salmonella | Posted on 22-02-2012
Tags: Biological Hazards, Food Borne Illness, Food Safety, Norovirus, Pasteurization, Raw Milk, Salmonella
There’s nothing quite like gulping down that first spray of milk at 5 o’clock in the morning—straight from the cow. While some associate drinking unpasteurized, or “fresh” milk, with fond memories growing up on the farm, others gag at the thought. But whether or not you have experienced the sensations of unpasteurized milk, the debates on its safety have some in an uproar.
Many people argue that unpasteurized milk is healthier than pasteurized milk because pasteurizing kills the “good” bacteria present in milk. But others, like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), refute this argument, explaining that pasteurization does not kill all forms of bacteria, only the disease-causing ones.
In fact, in today’s Washington Times, Stephen Dinan reports, “Fresh milk is 150 times more dangerous than pasteurized milk.” And there’s decent evidence to back it up. A 13-year review shows that in states where raw milk is available to consumers, dairy-related disease outbreaks happen at twice the rate. Not only that, but these types of diseases are more dangerous and, according to the study, caused 200 out of 239 hospitalizations.
So next time you think about enjoying another spray of milk, think twice.
Sources: Washington Times, CDC.gov





