
via http://lazypersonaltraining.blogspot.com
We at StateFoodSafety.com are big fans of the local foods movement. Using fresh, local ingredients makes food healthier and tastier, while helping the environment by reducing the carbon footprint of our food transportation system. We should all go out of our way to find and support local farmers and food producers that make food in a safe, hygienic, and environmentally sound manner.
That said, along with the local foods movement, we’ve seen a resurging interest in drinking raw, untreated milk from local dairies. Recent federal crackdowns on interstate sales and transport of unpasteurized milk products have raised quite a stink among raw milk drinkers, who suggest that Uncle Sam might have bigger fish to fry than shutting down local dairies selling raw milk and cheese to people who are asking specifically for it. That’s a political issue, and we’re not political experts at all. What we do know is that raw milk is a potentially dangerous product. Those who drink it risk making themselves seriously ill; those who give it to their children are risking much more.
The milking process, even on a small-scale level, is messy. Even the most careful milker can’t avoid all fecal contamination. Simply put, poop gets into milk, and that poop carries with it dangerous bacteria, including pathogenic strains of E. coli. Heating the milk to high temperatures kills those bacteria, rendering milk safe to drink. Skipping that step welcomes pathogens into the food supply.
Let’s look at a few arguments that raw-milk supporters typically make:
- When grass-fed cows are milked hygienically, less fecal contamination occurs and less pathogens are found in milk.
This is probably true, but allow us to point out that this is comparing raw milk to other pre-pasteurization milk products. Average pathogen levels in raw milk, no matter how responsibly produced it is, will be higher than in pasteurized milk products, and even moderate pathogen levels are enough to cause disease, especially in more vulnerable populations like children and the elderly.
- Raw milk is a “miracle” food. Its health benefits far outweigh the risks associated with drinking it.
Raw milk supporters cite miraculous benefits ranging from curing food allergies to preventing autism, but we’ve yet to see a persuasive, reputable study supporting any of these claims. The studies we’ve seen all suggest that pasteurization has only negligible effects on the nutritional content of milk. Click here to read a reasonable, fact-centered discussion of raw milk myths and misconceptions.
- Raw milk tastes better, and I should have the right to drink it if I want to.
While we wouldn’t encourage it, we have a hard time suggesting that adults who are informed of the risks involved shouldn’t be able to choose to drink raw milk. If you want your milk with extra poop in it, that’s your business. An adult choosing to drink raw milk is one thing; giving a child raw milk is another story. Because of their weaker immune systems, children bear a much higher risk of infection, and infections typically have much more serious ramifications for children. Pregnant women, the elderly, and anyone else with a compromised immune system are at similarly high risk.
Pasteurization is one of the most important food safety breakthroughs in history. Today, less than 1% of all food-borne illness outbreaks are associated with milk, compared to 25% in 1938. Those who wish to protect their families from listeria, E. coli, and other dangerous bacteria should only buy milk, cheese, and other dairy products that are labeled as having undergone pasteurization. Check out this FDA fact sheet for more information.





